The consequence of accepting tolerance as the main value must be the trigger that reinforces the notable activity in the society. With the negative impact of the popular measurements of defining the otherness, it appears that ideological climate in the political sphere should change in the future. To attain the higher tolerance, it is necessary to imply individualistic and communal approaches for the country. That is why such implications might significantly influence a higher level of human agency and consciousness due to freedom, diversity, and inclusiveness.

The individual methods of obtaining tolerance are the essential instrument in politics. The example of the European Union demonstrates that it is possible to attain the mixture of different cultures in the one society. Even though such entity is supposed to be stable, the necessity to implement the acceptance plays a crucial role in every country. In particular, singular coexistence may impact on people who live together. For this reason, respect should be the important measurements that could fight inequality in the society (Walzer, 1997). All things considered, tolerance and individuality can interrelate each other in terms of values and beliefs.

The collective explanation of tolerance is defined by diverse representatives of the community. For instance, France and Canada are famous for their active immigrant politics as they create viable possibilities for everyone. The acceptance of otherness is a necessary confrontation that should be taken into account by multicultural implications. The possibility to live in the one society is the vital standard for everyone who willingly accepts the otherness (Walzer, 1997). Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the significant legal implications that aim to reduce the improper circumstances.

To comprehend diversity is the important instrument for politics. As a matter of fact, confrontation is an essential feature that implements equal attitude towards each other. The welcoming community is an essential priority that identifies the standards of living and how to build the union of different cultures and countries (Dolan, 2013). The political implications could be easily found in the independent states in which the history of toleration is present in the country. The comprehension of tolerance is noted in the cases of giving the freedom to the national minorities. Importantly, the same aspect takes place after the First World war when the doctrine of diversity is introduced at the international level (Walzer, 1997). Hence, the perspectives of achieving the tolerance are possible due to the comprehension of the otherness and its roots.

The consequence of modernity has the impact on tolerance because more and more institutions become global in the whole world. They aim to unite the politics and economy that might make it easier for mutual trade. In my opinion, confrontation is the necessary element that produces the meaningful approaches in the process of maintaining the development of multiculturalism. Interestingly, the coexistence of different groups is effective in the cases of sustainable development of the procedural standards of acceptance. Hence, it might be meaningful to reinforce the activity of the future politics of multiculturalism. 

The progress of human agency is obvious for the world community because it might develop the concept of tolerance. The mutual principle of existence is the vital norm that tries to maintain the stability and prevent  the conflicts. For this reason, a new consciousness may arise from accepting the other thoughts about modernity and its positive circumstances on personality. The introduction of meaningful approaches and methods of acceptance the otherness might influence the way of thinking about multiculturalism. Notably, the development of the world reinforces the viable introduction of the study and how it suits for the implications of political measurements at the international stage. The perspectives to enrich the views of tolerance as the tool of understanding the otherness is vital in this situation. Therefore, it illustrates the transparent relationships with the new approaches in the politics. 

The need for an immediate action outlines the substantive meanings and features of the study. In addition, the need for transparent action and suitable means of information may reinforce the difference in the world. Even though the term of tolerance has a short development, it aims to penetrate the visible techniques of equality. The usability of power might positively influence the way of living and how it introduces the meaningful sustainability in the governance. The approaches in the main elements of governance and implementation of multiculturalism create a suitable environment for everyone who thinks about being accepted in a proper way.

To conclude, tolerance is a crucial aspect that forms the society in a positive way. Furthermore, it might potentially develop the tendency of multiculturalism with its effective measurements of the society in accordance with respect and comprehension. The necessity to reinforce the activity of the governance might be the substantive approach in the society that aims to challenge the way of living in the world. Thus,  the norms of otherness are unique methods that tend to develop the role of tolerance from the positive perspective.

The author of this sample is a professional academic writer from CustomWritings.com. Lauren Bradshaw is a blogger as well as one of the academic writers at CustomWritings.com. She is keen on content marketing, developing communication skills, and blogging, but she is also open to new knowledge. In 2003, she started her writing career as an SEO copywriter. Now, she takes place among top academic writers at a reputable service.

                        References

Dolan, T.C. (November 25, 2013). The true meaning of tolerance. Daily News. Retrieved from     http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/true-meaning-tolerance-article-1.1528660. 

Waltzer, M. (1997). On Toleration (1st ed.). New York: Yale Unoversity.